<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rssdatehelper="urn:rssdatehelper"><channel><title>Agency1903 Blog comment feed</title><link>http://www.agency1903.com</link><pubDate></pubDate><generator>umbraco</generator><description></description><language>en</language><item><title>
          Re Social Media: Brand Saturation is not a Brand Experience by Agency1903</title><link>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/11/22/social-media-brand-saturation-is-not-a-brand-experience#comment-17</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/11/22/social-media-brand-saturation-is-not-a-brand-experience#comment-17</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ Thanks David,<br/>
Great response. We love that just after your response, Google+ entered the mix. As of today, there are over 18mm users, each of which are learning a different way to communicate socially. A more pointed way at that. The next three months should be rather interesting.<br/>
<br/>
Regards,<br/>
1903]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>
          Re Social Media: Brand Saturation is not a Brand Experience by David B.</title><link>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/11/22/social-media-brand-saturation-is-not-a-brand-experience#comment-16</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/11/22/social-media-brand-saturation-is-not-a-brand-experience#comment-16</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ Interesting post, though it may fall under the rubric of "know your target market" I would add "know your social media". It is not constructive to compare Facebook "fans" and Twitter followers. FB and Twitter are two different forms of media, "apples to oranges". FB is more of an online "community", though I am loath to use the term, where likes of products, brands, tv shows, sports teams, etc., are interchangable building blocks of an online persona, the idealized reflection of the user. Twitter is a more effective media for the disseminatation of information. For instance,  a Facebook user may "Like" Coca-Cola because he wants people to know he enjoys Coke over Pepsi, and on his Twitter account, he may not follow Coca-Cola, unless he feels that their corporate account has pertinent information to share, sales, e.g. sales or promotions. However, like you noted, this will likely change over the next few years as social media evolves or devolves, or dies off (Myspace)]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>
          Re A Picture is Worth 3 - 4 Words by Mike W.</title><link>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/a-picture-is-worth-3-4-words#comment-7</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/a-picture-is-worth-3-4-words#comment-7</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ This is a fantastic technology, but it seems like it's taking away the importance of having human control over content (i.e. an information architect). I guess in the long run it will potentially increase sales.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>
          Re Why 1903? by Francis Cleetus</title><link>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/why-1903#comment-13</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/why-1903#comment-13</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ I was intrigued by your agency name, and now I like its profound and back-to-the-basics meaning! <br/>
<br/>
Interestingly, I zeroed in on a tagline for my online portfolio about a year ago that's similar to yours. Check it out at franciscleetus.com<br/>
<br/>
I'm a freelance creative director these days, and would love to explore opportunities to work together.  ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>
          Re Is There an App for Gaining Mindshare? by Daren</title><link>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/is-there-an-app-for-gaining-mindshare#comment-9</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/is-there-an-app-for-gaining-mindshare#comment-9</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ I just read through this and I'm having a hard time understanding Danes comment. We can all make the assumption that a blog post is written to increase page ranking, so nice try there. The article offers the reader a challenge to decide between writing object C code vs. HTML 5 for mobile applications - specifically iPhone apps. Take a look at Target's app or similar - was there a specific reason why this couldn't operate as an app w/ a HTML browser loading HTML 5 content that is also accessible via other mobile devices - not app exclusive? HTML 5 is not the holy grail, it's just a way to make content more accessible and provides a unique flexibility to presenting content although it's obviously in it's infancy.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>
          Re A Picture is Worth 3 - 4 Words by Agency1903</title><link>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/a-picture-is-worth-3-4-words#comment-12</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/a-picture-is-worth-3-4-words#comment-12</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ That's a very valid point, Mike. I think as the technology matures though, it could be used more as a tool than as a dictator of ad placement. I don't think it's a stretch to assume that it could work on a collaborative level as well as automatic. <br/>
<br/>
Thanks for your thoughts!]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>
          Re Is There an App for Gaining Mindshare? by Agency1903</title><link>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/is-there-an-app-for-gaining-mindshare#comment-11</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/is-there-an-app-for-gaining-mindshare#comment-11</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ Dane, thanks for your comment. We’re not trying hail HTML5 as anything more than it is. In fact, we’re pointing out areas in which HTML5 is NOT the best option (see the last two paragraphs of the article). Our stance is merely that the general consuming public deserves to know that there are options when it comes to creating rich digital experiences; strategic options at that. We are also arguing that while Apple’s success in gaining mindshare is commendable, there should be a level of awareness surrounding HTML5 experiences as well.<br/>
<br/>
Thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts! ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>
          Re Is There an App for Gaining Mindshare? by Dane</title><link>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/is-there-an-app-for-gaining-mindshare#comment-8</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/is-there-an-app-for-gaining-mindshare#comment-8</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ Is there a point to this article other than trying to enhance your page ranking?  HTML5 is great, but as you mentioned, it can only be "not too great."  Let's not try and pretend that HTML5 is the holy grail of development.  Then you start looking like the Java crusaders.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>
          Re Is There an App for Gaining Mindshare? by minsk</title><link>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/is-there-an-app-for-gaining-mindshare#comment-14</link><pubDate></pubDate><guid>http://www.agency1903.com/blog/2010/8/9/is-there-an-app-for-gaining-mindshare#comment-14</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ with the new jquery mobile framework...html 5 and jquery make it relatively simple to make a nice mobile app. you also dont have to deal with the apple nazis.]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>
